Dealing with insurance companies after an auto collision can feel more like a chess match than a simple claim. Their goal often centers on reducing payouts, while injured drivers just want fair compensation. Knowing the defenses these companies use can help claimants better prepare before speaking with adjusters or hiring an auto accident lawyer near me.
Arguing That the Injured Driver Shared Most of the Fault
One of the first defenses an insurance company might use is the claim that the injured driver caused or contributed to the crash. Alabama’s contributory negligence law allows insurers to deny payment if they can prove the victim was even slightly at fault. This means that something as small as not signaling a turn or braking too late could be exaggerated into shared blame.
Adjusters often rely on small inconsistencies in statements or police reports to build this argument. Even if another driver clearly acted recklessly, insurers may use traffic camera footage or witness interpretation to claim partial fault. This makes it essential for drivers to seek help from a car accident attorney near me who understands how to counter these arguments effectively.
Claiming the Injuries Were Preexisting or Unrelated to the Crash
Another frequent defense involves questioning whether the injuries came from the accident at all. Insurance companies may argue that the pain or medical condition existed beforehand or stemmed from a separate incident. They often comb through medical records to find any past treatment that can be linked to the current claim.
This tactic pressures the injured person to prove the exact cause of each injury. Even if the crash worsened a preexisting condition, adjusters may try to minimize its significance. Thorough medical documentation and professional testimony can make the difference between a dismissed claim and full compensation.
Disputing the Severity of Reported Physical or Emotional Harm
Insurers regularly challenge the seriousness of reported injuries. They might accept that an injury occurred but argue that it’s far less severe than described. This can include questioning the need for certain treatments, therapy sessions, or medication.
In many cases, adjusters downplay emotional distress or trauma resulting from the crash. They suggest that anxiety or sleep issues are exaggerated or unrelated. A strong legal team helps ensure that both visible and invisible injuries receive fair recognition and compensation under state law.
Questioning the Accuracy of Police and Witness Statements
Insurance companies sometimes attack the credibility of official reports. They may point out inconsistencies between what witnesses said at the scene and later statements. Even slight discrepancies in details like vehicle speed or lane position can become the foundation of a dispute.
These companies also exploit the fact that not all police reports are detailed or completely accurate. Adjusters might claim the officer missed an important factor or misunderstood the situation. To counter this, experienced auto accident lawyers near me often use independent investigations, photographs, and expert reconstruction to strengthen their client’s case.
READ ALSO: Dashcam Dangers: NYC Car Accident Lawyers Reveal When Your Footage Can Hurt Your Case
Using Delayed Medical Treatment to Undermine Credibility
Delays between an accident and medical care are often portrayed as proof that injuries weren’t serious. Insurers argue that if someone didn’t seek immediate treatment, they must not have been hurt badly. Unfortunately, this overlooks how adrenaline and shock can mask pain after a crash.
In reality, symptoms such as whiplash, back strain, or internal injuries may take hours or days to appear. Victims who wait to see a doctor for financial reasons or scheduling conflicts can still face unfair skepticism. Lawyers often use expert medical testimony to show that delayed treatment doesn’t disprove legitimate injury.
Minimizing Compensation by Citing Policy Limit Restrictions
Policy limits become another line of defense for insurance companies. Even when damages clearly exceed coverage, they may argue that they’re only responsible for the stated limit in the policy. This can be frustrating when hospital bills and lost wages go far beyond that amount.
Sometimes, insurers fail to disclose all applicable coverages or secondary policies that could help cover costs. Skilled attorneys know how to review the fine print, identify additional coverage, and pursue other liable parties if necessary. Without professional guidance, many victims settle for less than their claim’s true value.
Challenging Repair Estimates and Property Damage Reports
Damage to a vehicle often becomes a separate point of contention. Insurers might dispute the cost of repairs, claim parts can be reused, or insist on using cheaper replacement materials. Their goal is to reduce payout amounts wherever possible.
To justify smaller payments, they may bring in their own adjusters or third-party inspectors who undervalue the damages. Detailed repair invoices and independent mechanic assessments are vital to counter these tactics. Understanding the real cost of property loss ensures victims aren’t left with unsafe or incomplete repairs.
Asserting That Weather or Road Conditions Caused the Collision
Sometimes insurers try to shift the cause of the accident away from human error. They may argue that heavy rain, fog, or slick roads were primarily responsible, not their insured driver. This approach can make proving liability more complex, especially if the crash occurred during poor weather conditions.
However, even in bad weather, drivers are expected to act responsibly. Speeding, tailgating, or failing to use headlights can still constitute negligence. By showing that reasonable care wasn’t taken, an attorney can dismantle this defense and keep the focus on driver behavior rather than the environment.
Insurance companies have a wide range of strategies designed to protect their bottom line. Victims in Huntsville benefit from understanding these defenses early and preparing evidence to counter them. The Lackey Law Firm assists clients by identifying weak points in insurance arguments, ensuring their rights remain protected throughout the claims process.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Why Going to the ER After a Car Accident Is Not Enough to Win Your Injury Claim According to a New York Car Accident Lawyer
